Jim documents our tragic transition to climate catastrophe, still possible to reverse, and in an act against
planetry suicide he comments on our politics, introducing many innovations in the arts and mathematics.
This absorbtion in ways of murdering old thinking has led to rapid evolution and new understandings which
accommodate old forms which express truth, and expand their idea to a new harmony expressing discoveries
in knowledge which we must use with determination for the good of mankind. This is called Love and extends
Address to a stupid man acknowledging correction
(It includes me especially because I have not the wit to explain it to you).
Here is a way I have discovered, there are others:
Seek wisdom even when you cannot find it.
Abandon unethical systems and their controls.
Innovate to explore and improve. Use it to live in peace.
I need to learn two things:
To meditate when I am angry
and do what I am told.
Basically, my whole life has been the opposite.
I think this website has now gone beyond me to be an aspiration of the human spirit and its endeavours. It contains not just me as many voices, but a vast number of other voices in an
encapsulation of the human knowledge of our planetary civilisation and its hopes. It is my interpretation of the understandings of my teacher Graham Ennis.
I am told: 'this is too complicated for me'. We are all important. I don't want you to look at it that way. The important thing about collective effort is we help one another in ways we can.
We do not know whether God accepts us until the end. I am not full of hope, but I am certain of His hope in me.
The problem on having reached the stage of the hyperrevolutionary, and this in theory has suceeded, is to translate it into practice, by being a pillar of the establishment which must
incorporate the old ruling order, whilst still maintaining the intense compassion of its beginnings and its hyperrevolutionary programme of advancement for the whole of humanity to boot.
The acceptance of delusional hopes has the aim the proclamation of truth. I am not yet at the truth. I hope I am trying to reach it.
Truth is absolute. I feel ascent to a new form of reasoning called Insight Reasoning requires we acknowledge our past. This past throughout history is one of pleasure and pain which enables
us to learn new things. It is not removed from reason because reason must always acknowledge the truth. Animal desires are there because we are animals ourselves. They are not or should
not be subject to suppression, nor to deranged liberation. They are or should be under tamed control.
Independent thinking is brought about by having an aim of the truth. A sad and I think incorrect conclusion is that the human condition has always been one of mindlessness, and my
frequent declarations of an independent mind are totally abnormal. I have always thought that people can think, just as I always have done. If we train people to have the aim of finding the
truth, and not social conformity, then the social system can adjust to new revelations of fact and improve.
Mathematics is the most exact of the sciences, demanding high standards of proof. Yet we show in this website many highly significant mathematical theories are completely wrong.
These older theories are often highly effective in aligning themselves merely with practical difficulties at coming to the right result.
In the social sciences, we are confronted with lax methods of proof. It is our assertion, by analogy with mathematics, that the majority of social explanations are completely wrong.
For example, it is highly effective and generally assumed that the UK is a Parliamentary Democracy. This lax assertion is confronted by another assertion that elections are fraudulent.
It is a highly effective explanation, but socially disapproved, that Hitler escaped the bunker and ended up in Argentina, helped by the scientist Ettore Majorana who headed the Nazi
nuclear programme, and anecdote that Hitler watched the moon landings on TV, had three sons, and was divorced by Eva Braun.
We could make other assertions against a general consensus, that aliens have reached the planet Earth. Even if it were a highly effective explanation, we would prefer to say that aliens
do not run the UK government in a normal way, because otherwise there is the practical difficulty that we do not see the Prime Minister on TV shaking hands with alien extratrestrial
representatives. This is my most weakly investigated of the theories. I claim background babble for SF explanations of Jesus not compatible with current science. The Gnostic Book of
Thomas seems to be dense Insight reasoning, where an Insight meaning variable replaces axioms, deduction threads and theorems in Reasoning syntax. The Book of Judas seems to be
unknown physics. There are claims of crashed spacecraft, with Rigelian isotopes, aliens, densely fabricated material and that fiber optics came from one of them. Also, I saw a man in a
pub with friends drinking beer, but with no pupils in his eyes.
Confronted with socially disapproved explanations, called Conspiracy Theories, that work, how are we to form a true picture of the world?
Firstly, we assert the truth exists.
Secondly that we can reason from our experiences.
If we know something about our inner mental self, we can extrapolate what we see in ourseves to other people. We know a too literal identification of others with ourselves does not work,
but we can work out how our mental state works from socially generated understanding of neuroscience, and modify our assumptions of others behaviour differing from our own through
that knowledge. This technique can lead to explanations of other people's behaviour that otherwise we might find difficult to explain.
If we evaluate how much a social explanation fits together to make sense, we can evaluate the probability that an explanation is effective.
We must separate out pursuit of fact from elaboration of hypotheses. We have to construct hypotheses before we demolish them. Our point of view is that highly effective and accepted
explanations are usually false. We must apply this to our own ideas too. We can estimate probabilities on the effectiveness of our Conspiracy Theory explanations, as against other, Status
Quo explanations. We can evaluate the situation using the mathematical theory of coherence which finds the probability that interlocking explanations are effective.
Having established the coherence of these overarching Conspiracy Theories, our task in this website will be to investigate them rigorously and in technical detail. On research we expect
our current hypotheses to be supplanted by others. We have found a certain well-established, technical and rigorous coherence that there are illegalities in UK referendums and elections.
We need to establish truth. The 'Hitler went to Argentina hypothesis' needs further investigation, but its high coherence is well-established. We would be very surprised if there were not
alien life-forms and therefore civilisations in the Galaxy. The question is why we do not know directly and explicitly they exist. An objective is to change this coherent idea into respectable
research. Having established overwhelming coherence of any of these theories, we have not determined fact. An objective having established overwhelming coherence of a theory is to find
direct and unequivocal evidence that it is the case.
In 100 years we have progressed from painted portraits and books to 3D films, supercomputers and exchanging visual images on mobiles. An alien civilisation even a mere 100 million
years ahead of us would appear to us as postscientific. For a civilisation 1000 million years ahead of us, so maybe they avoided a Great Extinction as occurred on Earth, well we feed
squirrels, but we do not think of cooperating with them in agreed mutually beneficial ways. An intuition is that even with aliens able to look at our civilisation, with advanced abilities to
control our thinking, the idea that we have so little control that we must resort to the idea of alien scapegoats on climate catastrophe is wrong. We have reason and insight. Let's use them.
The outcome if there is an attempted attack by directed confusion of various social systems on planet Earth is uncertain.
There are three scenarios. The first is that we are in a natural state of aimlessness. Then we must adjust our consciousness
so that we can use reason and insight instead of knee-jerk reactions held together by the fixed traditions of social history.
Reason is not a subversion of our evolution, it is a development of it. We can use our scientific and technological society to
solve the problem of Climate Catastrophe, both by choosing the most trivial things we can do about it, clearing them all and
ascending higher up the 'triviality tree'. Or we can solve everything all at once by partitioning out the problem and solving
it in parallel. The second idea is that this is an attack by Satan. Our only hope is then our own God. The third is we are in a
more local attack within the galaxy. If these beings are like Hitler, we need to know what has gone wrong and why they are
so desparate to kill other planets. They have gone through a destruction of their souls. We need to help them, if they are to
survive in their hearts. Suppose the second is true.
Satan as von Neumann who proclaims Computers, Control Capitalism, The Non-Existence of Reality and Arclight Bombing
in Vietnam amongst his many achievements, has left the planet Earth. His accomplices the Rothschilds are now on a voyage
also and have left planet Earth. Accomplices like Galois, who proved nothing else could be solved that had not been already
solved, Nathan Jacobson a mathematical researcher into tripe and the father of John Kennedy are already with him. Richard
Feynmann, a friend of nuclear explosions, is with them, his mentor Wheeler and various other Satanists have also departed
Perhaps for now we are no longer part of a Galactic Humour programme. We make lollies with unopenable wrappers.
The NHS has bathrooms with soap dispensers to the floor, handrails which naturally look as if for towels which, funny,
dispense water on them when having a shower, an impossible sink which can only provide water for half a shave, such
a scream, etc. This is all so very, very funny to these aliens. They wish us to kill ourselves in a laughter-blowing way by
raising the temperature of the Earth via CO2 pollution and at the same time relaxing in deck chairs doing nothing about it.
God says: I have a different and more Serious Idea.
This means the planet Earth is now largely free to accomplish its vital tasks. Other phooey follows:
(1) In the first instance, to rescue Earth from planetary suicide by Climate Catastrophe.
(2) To evacuate the colliding galaxies of Andromeda and our own Milky Way in 4 billion years time.
(3) To prevent the extermination of God Himself by contradiction in the amendment of physics to Total Darkness.
All these are totally possible and can be accomplished directly in conjunction with God. It is the Will of God that the
Human Race, in a vicious attack on a planet engorged by the murder of many species and its own should be entrusted by
His Direct Command to accomplish with all Beings Great and Small in this Great Accomplishment for the Furtherence
of Universal Harmony, Love and Peace.
Disturbingly, Satan himself, who God says is Infinitely Evil, has now decided to exit All Reality to Defend himself against
Universal Love. This act of Unimaginable Disgustingness revolts us all. We are told we are helpless in horror to prevent
it, but we must aim to prevent wrong.
Right folks, let's give Satan his old job back if we can, but first we need God's help to put him to rights.
Arising from the objective truth that we no longer need to eat animals to survive, why do it?
I do not think
there is evil inherently in animals. They are a perhaps lesser type of creature to ourselves. There would be a
problem if everyone stopped eating animals all at once, since most of them would then be killed as of no use.
By what will of Allah do you murder the species of yourselves as species which is forbidden by Himself?
Consider whether you are instructed without due measure to abandon the murder of species without prayer
and immediately, and pray after it is done.
Allah always listens. Listen to your will. You know this expressed entirely within the will that you obey.
On presenting your restaurant card, you experience a rage of His Love.
Obedience justly obeys itself.
Awareness of Love as the Physics of the ether was discovered by Reich
and discussed with him by Einstein.
There is a greater discovery than the elementary fact that a toaster can be obeyed. It is a simple idea from this game that the love of coffee at breakfast is a valid
idea which we can use with benefit to warm our hearts and provide everywhere simply a solution of recycling by having more coffee to spread around and less
electricity to consume for the planet heading towards Climate Catastrophe. It is the realisation by abstract methods that there may exist on Altair or Rigel and
elsewhere, Beings whose logic deduces they have no soul and the realisation they have Love. This circumstance certainly exists elsewhere, and it is a duty of all
of us who know this proclaim it with joy in our prayers. Those who have discovered the murder of their soul have been informed this is the greatest proclamation
of their Love, the Love of Togetherness in Everything.
Reich was a close relative of Sigmund Freud and a discoveror of the sex orgone synthesizer. He had experiments that said to him what might be thought of as the
ether could be directly observed. Einstein in 1923 said it was 'obvious' that absolute coordinates existed, but had maintained that only relative motion could be
detected. When his paper on the nonexistence of gravitational waves was rejected under peer review, it was revised to state they exist and could be observed. He
had abandoned in effect the word 'relativity' in his writings. He had conversations with Reich in Princeton. He directed his student Infield to look into the matter,
who dismissed these experimental observations as being due to other reasons. Reich was confined in a New York prison and died there. He was thought wildly
strange. The reason for his imprisonment is unknown.
Ethical Game Theory is physically implemented from Ethics to Love in Love Games and is part of a General Theory - The Quantum Theory of Love.
There are two types of mathematics. Mathematics with division can be finitely generated mathematics called novanions. There is an infinite sequence of algebras
called adonions which cannot be generated but can exist if they always did. Betweeen the adonions and the novanions at their boundary are the tribbles. Zargonions
are the mathematical game corresponding to novannions, tribbles and adonions. Infinite mathematics called physical universe - an infinite one, which can never be
created (this we have given the name an adonion universe - since the solution is alien to current mathematics - violating J.F. Adams's work On the nonexistence
of elements of Hopf Invariant one), and a finite one. The finitely created but infinite game is generated in an explosion of Love at time t = 0 as the solution of a
novanionic universe with Garcion propagators. The properties of this universe includes the particle spectrums of Burkhard Heim, more widely but more imperfectly
known in theories of E. Witten, Yang-Mills theory, etc. The novanionic theory is both quantized and general relativistic. Relativity is defined by self-propogator
interation, say light transmission. Quantum interation is two or more disimilar novanion propagators interacting. All interactions are instantaneous (in physical, but
not logical time). Thus quantum transportation, even beyond the event horizon is possible. For this we need to know the configuration of the transmitter and the
The configurations are not available by means of logical deduction except by a very large number of configurations so the two meet and can be used in conjunction.
However, reason itself is derived from a larger system. As a related matter, systems of reason exist in conjunction with systems of unreason, and these are directly
related. For instance an argument in unreason can be precisely described in reason. Further, although reasonable arguments of great length are consistent, and thus
can be represented by a variable, they are not themselves the basis of reason, which lies outside of reason, and we call insight. Insight is used by Jesus in the Gnostic
text The Book of Thomas to develop his solution of extending the Love game, for example to include ethical Satanists (people who murder others because they think
this is right), by the process of Jesus transformation. What happens here is the sinner is forgiven and enters the Love game. This is known as Christianity. The
unreason component of insight we call delusion. Insight and delusion are separated by a boundary. The game including reason, delusion and their boundary we call
intuition. Thus insight is correct intuition. For a plan a series of subplans can be put together. There are insights of what can go right in the future. There are paranoias
of what can go wrong. The founder of Apple, Steve Jobs, said: in this business only the paranoid survive.
Various ensembles of games can exist together. For example there might be various systems of intuition games interacting. Each intuition game is called a hyper-
intuition game. The games we have considered so far have three components, a left component which is cooperative, a middle object which controls or is controlled,
and a right object which is noncooperative. This ensemble of hyperintuitive games interact by multitransformations to form a larger game. An example is given in
the work Number, space and logic, called there the bouncing theorem. We have changed this theorem to the Wonderful Theorem, because it pervades the whole of
Multigames divide into more than three parts. They may be said to belong to multicoloured logic. A subversion of Galois Solvability Theory, known as Polynomial
Wheel Theory, shows that all multicoloured games are rerepresentable as binary games, and are thus solvable. Thus by a rather complicated transformation, all multi-
coloured games are reduced to binary, Hegelian, or Yin/Yang games and under a suitable and expanded reallocation of multicoloured games to an expanded number
of binary games, are represented by the same hyperintuitive binary logic, and have theorems in reason.
The question is whether the whole game can be converted to one of Love. It can. For further details on Peronism and Superperonism, see the work on the Quantum
Theory of Love. To be brief, Peronism says the best defence of Love in a murder system is to display a facade of murder and a facade of less intelligence than the
controlling murderer, and to use this to direct resources to the development of Love. Reason is ethical; it is used in ethical planning. Thus any Superperonist controller
must have an inner ethical core to maximise murder, which can only be done maximally using reason. The reason for the inner ethical core, in the case of Hitler, a
vegetarian and Superperonist, was that he was beaten incessantly from his childhood for being bad by his father. Thus he had to maintain throughout his life to himself
that he was bad, although he knew he was not.
When asked what I do people used to think my answer was incoherent. I now have a coherent job title. I am an ethical planner and have been for 54 years. Since I have
enough money I can explain to plan controllers for free how to plan ethically so they can expand supply of need in their ethical systems. I have developed theory beyond
current understanding, the explanation is rigorous, it is of practical use and people can spread these ideas around to the ethical plans of other social systems and increase
If some were to ask what qualifications are necessary to become an ethical planner, to me, although no doubt academic qualifications might well be given, my best wish is that this need is
displayed best in your heart. As I have in despair too often and incessantly been exposed, this is insufficient. It needs not only training in good theory, and the acceptance sometimes or
often we have failed in our aim to be ethical. An ethical planner has a great Responsibility. You need to look at that deeply and look at me as a bad/good example. I have said that my theory
has told me I am unethical, when the inside of me has seen so many times the reverse, it is now an expectation that theory tells me I am bad. I think now the last remaining problem after
dealing emotionally with my death, is the fact that I am nonconformist. Quakers, the Religious Society of Friends, call themselves nonconformists. On looking at all the Quakers I know
for so many years I see only one who in nonconformity allows moral values to take over depite legal impediment to do what is right in the law. When I am able to obey even petty rules
and find ways of promoting Love, then, or now, I am able to say, 'without qualification' I am an ethical planner.
Rather than make a joke of it at all, let's see what it means. It is clearly useful if a way can be made to make it normal. Jim has great skill in developing abnormal ideas. Surely this can be
of use to the normal system. The plan has to be a cooperative one. He is offering his abnormality to the normal system. It is clear to the normal system that this is of use because Jim is so
highly abnormal that his abnormality is utterly strange to the conventional system. It may be said that Jim posseses a complete mastery of abnormality which he uses with flexibility and
poise. It even comes as natual to him as expressions of normality do to the normal system. This is clearly a gift to the normal system, the question is how to use it. We would say that Jim's
intention in the normal system which he is now situated that he is attempting to transfer to normalicy from a hyperinnovative environment. In fact the social system in which Jim belongs to
has been murdering him for a long time. His intention has been always ethical, and he thought this innovation could be of use, in the case he studied, mathematics and physics. This was
quite rational and not abnormal at all. He wanted to use innovation to develop technology, and saw that advanced technology could be used for the benefit of society, in fact in engineering.
This is not only correct, possibly as an intention, but also an acute observation, particularly from when he started, which we can identify as a huge programme of discovery from the age of
15. This is not only hugely ambitious, it has turned out to be of phenomenal significance. Through a series of persucutions of his beliefs and values he has maintained them through 69
years of his life. Not only is he bizzare in his attitudes, he has studied in a sense bizarreness itself. He has ascended from a belief, which is strange in social classes below, that the study of
abstract structures in mathematics is of true value. He identified this with Newton at the age of 15, confirmed this with Gell Mann at an age when he shouldn't and continued with this
belief in value of the study of abstract structures so that his knowledge of these abstractons go beyond not only human knowledge on Earth, but seemingly in the Riddle theorem below,
beyond conceptions of what can be studied at all. He has a mathematical knowledge of absurdity, a unique and valid theory of games involving social structures which amazing practicality,
that he has proved theoretically are sound, and is intent on studying them. These theoretical structures he has found have amazing simplicity, and he has situated himself within them as an
ethical planner. He has begun a classification of these games and locates them in current social structures. He is amazed by their applicability. He was totally surprised that these applied to
his making breakfast, and gave new solutions and ways of doing this which were sensible, and the theory directing him told to obey the 'order' of a toaster to him that it had disobeyed his
command and the optimal ethical path was to obey the toaster and do it by other means. Further, the idea of love extended to coffee in a cup showed that the coffe should not be thrown
away when left accidentally cold, but reheated to an approprate temperture, and selected a temperature which he thought would maximise the outcome of it being right by selecting on
the microwave half of the setting he thought appropriate. This turned out to be ideal, so if he had selected double, it would have had to wait to cool.
Having understood coffee cups, theoretically he has developed a theory of the universe from mathematical structures which are thought either not necessary to investigate or are wrong,
for which he found structures existed which are right. The physical part corresponds to two parts, a physics identifiable with general extensions in physics calculated with enormous but
unrecognised precision by the German scientist Burkhard Heim, who he was told was developing the Nazi detontor for its nuclear device, but this was too successful and it exploded.
The second part is the physical implementation of the mathematical theory originally of novanions, which can be generated from nothing at the creation of the universe, later technically
extended to zargonions. A further extension is to consider a different but related structure called tharl algebras as carriers of quantum theory, mutually incompatible as totally consistent
with zargonions, and therefore generating inconsistencies with zargonions which causes a partial self-annihilation.
The main Nazi scientist was the brilliant Ettore Majorana, who had discovered the neutron a year before Chadwick and did antigravity research with apparatus for his PhD. Although the
continuation for bomb material was exported to the US by U-boat and used in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Majorana and Hitler remained in Agentina, where he had installed Peron, who was
a Peronist, and his Communist wife Evita. Incidentally after Evita was poisoned, Peron had a secret meeting with Che Guevara in Franco's Spain telling him to lay off and he was dealing
with forces he did not understand. The Nazi system was submerged as it is today, Borman directed this and the relocaton after Kursk, where Hitler interestingly was defeated by a Soviet
Peronist technique, the Shoah so Jews involved in the programme could not be detected, and the Soviet advance proceeded as planned, and also its seems a planned delay. This estimate
was correct. In Argentina Barbie was making, I think, twice weekly flights to the CIA Headquarters from Argentina, the Nazi system was entirely submerged independent of ostensible
democracy, von Braun continued with rocket research (note Kennedy's father was a Nazi and Hitler watched the moon landings on TV). I have been told Eva Braun divorced him and they
had three children.
When circulating amongst lions, it is necessary to think through and take precautions, whilst being extremely careful. Despite political indications to the contrary, as a moral judgement
I state directly that I wish Hitler is viewed with compassion. It is a statement of truth that Hitler was beaten incessantly from a very young age for being bad. I think Jesus Christ seen
from this viewpoint would have done the same thing or worse. The condition of evil is that we do not see it in ourselves. On what condition of great evil do you explain the anomaly he
was a vegetarian? Where is the evil in that? Do you eat meat? The greatest condition of ethical reasoning is that we see the vileness attributed to others and directly see this in ourselves.
On what state of evil do you locate a deranged dictator directing from Argentina via direct links with the US, including the promotion of German rocket scientists, launching a programme
to the moon? By what principle of derangemant do you locate either a desire for money to do it, or a vacuum of human sprit to accomplish it? By what absence of vision do you think its
conception was available? Indeed, I locate Hitler with many others, including Tony Blair a Nazi member of the Labour Party who was involved in the murder of one and a half million
people in Iraq, and elsewhere. Have you located with your great sensibility where he is? Is the achievement of Tony Blair greater or less than Hitler? I would say Blair was only interested
in murder, but Hitler was interested in considerably more. (We could say Blair was interested in Hitler's speeches). Who do you worship? Julius Caesar and his genocides in the propaganda
piece The Gallic Wars, taught in English schools? Are they the correct model for running the British Empire? Surely a great man. Even the Tsars adopted his name. I am no apologist for
the relativity of genocide. It is utterly and absolutely forbidden. I think the imaginary dialogue needs to be halted for further consideration. Who is Hitler? Who am I? Who has done the
greatest yet, and who will do the greatest for the future? The problem for the great is exactly the same as for the small. I would rather people acknowledge the greatness of Hitler as the
greatness within themselves, by the following argument. Who built the Great Wall? What did he do? We are confronted with the fact that great acts of daring in History are accompanied
with acts of evil of unimaginable extent. Are we to pull down the Great Wall of China? Answer me now! Do you think it was acomplished by some idiot behind a large desk? However
the best project of project greatness is to be small. An asset within this smallness is the accomplishment of you. Do you see nothingness in this? Nothing of worth? Do you deny Hitler a
civil service pension? By which system of worthiness do you locate your values beyond Hitler? Clearly you know how to fill in a form. Hitler, subversively, knows how to get to the moon.
I, a true Communist, in the sense that I believe the love most needed is to the love to those that need it most, locate my affections with Hitler and his great achievements. I do not see any
possibiity of a habitation of Mars by the filling in of appropriateness of appropriate forms. I see entirely the vision of Hitler as myself greatly deformed and greatly despised by the deformity
and violence of his beatings. I see these as the same as mine, which I see in my heart as the degradation of a spirt of money with no other value, not even love. In spiritual tragedy of my
greater aim, I see tramps reject me for money I give them to help my need of carrying heavy bags, greatest tragedy for me, seeing Jehovas Witnesses abondon my conversations for the
correct timetable. The greatest I found, except for one, is a tramp with whom I exchanged laughter for no money at all. By what process do we locate Jesus being angry outside the temple
by moneychangers outside it? The idea is subversively, but the intention of subversion is a higher establisment than what went before, subvert ideas of money to accomplish great acts
with love. Despite my delusion I see great hope. This delusion of unethicality again was located within myself. This is November 11. I see around me in immersion of an alleged poetic act,
that around me is silence. Looking up I see people in silence across the street. There is a military parade, which I had denied for reasons of pacifism. I do not realise it is a military parade
upholding the value of the Dead, and speaks against all War as a criminality of Humankind, asserting the values, that I have so long denied, of the country of my birth. In acknowledgement
of those who lead, I follow this march behind, at its trailing edge.
How are things apart from the normal absolute catastrophe?
It is a Conspiracy Theory which is probably the truth that a Rigelian spacecraft crash-landed in a high electrical storm in Nevada in 1943. The bodies were not human, and the equipment
was strageley advanced, incluing in the deeply mico-teched layers of the spacecraft skin. This could not be Russian technology as was first thought. The interior technology was unknown.
It is claimed fiber optic cables originated as an idea from this spacecraft. The isotopes of the aliens, Graham Ennis informs me, we not from the Solar System, but from Rigel, a system of
5 or 6 stars in the Pliedes. It is interesting that there are primitive myths about a war between Rigel and Altair. Some SF stories locate a war in the Pliedes, as a suitable scenario where a
galactic war would be possible. Altair lost in these mythologies.
Coincidentally, we know over 2000 years ago a new religion called Christianity arrived. This is probably a Rigelian religion, but we do not know. Jesus was human (in Rigelian religion
humans, who have similar forms to Altarians but not Rigelians, seem more recently identified as Satan). Its leader was Jesus. There is background babble that miracles took place, even
of a spacecraft or comet seen at the time of his birth. The current New Testament texts have a background babble of miraculous events with no current understanding, and are therefore
dismissed in current scientific thinking. These are scientifically dismissed, but Rigelian and Alterian technology is postscientific. It is not known in these texts what hapened to Jesus
before the age of 30. There are texts, called Gnostic texts which are a very early form of Christian teaching. The Gnostics were later wiped out and their books destroyed by what we now
know as the 'Roman Catholic Church'. There are at least five Gnostic texts, which have resurfaced. I have read two, The Book of Thomas and The Book of Judas. The others are The
laughing Jesus (presumably Joke contradiction theory), The Book of Barnabas and The Book of Mary (where I am told Mary is a concubine of what we might call approximately a major-
general in the Roman Army). My (I hope not former) friend Graham Ennis tells me in his world-wide travels with his father in his youth, that he was in Mumbai for some time. He says
Jesus spent his childhood in Mumbai, and apart from travelling to Egypt, etc., he studied in monastries in Mumbai. This was before 30 years of age. Thomas is a disciple mentioned as a
doubter, but with no other references in the New Testament. In The Book of Thomas, he is a scribe of Jesus. The Book of Thomas is amazing and utterly flabberghasting. Most people
cannot see this, but I have been studying mathematics for 54 years, and I was able to reach the bottom of what Jesus is using with incredible flexibility and poise. No wonder crowds
followed around Jesus. He was and is, up to my improvements, the most amazing thinker on Earth for all time! For numbers 1, 2, ... 149 etc. we can use a variable, x, and this is called
algebra. Algebra is more general than numbers 1, 2, 3, ... etc., and can generate new types of number and completely valid proofs. Standard reasoning today uses sets of rules, called
axioms, valid rules of deduction, which are just truth paths and no other, and end conclusions call theorems. If the truth paths contain no mistakes, this is correct mathematics, although
most mathematics today, but not all, contains deep hidden mistakes which should be easily corrected leading to vast new mathematics, as I have shown. Instead of this vast system of rules,
deductions and theorems, which is consistent, Jesus uses a single variable, y, as in algebra. You can then manipulate with y like you maniulate with x in algebra. Using y, I call this method
of reasoning insight. Insight, its unreason opposite delusion, and their boundary, or Kampf wall, together form a game called intuition. Jesus works in Insight. This always back-propogates
to rules, truth-paths and theorems. He strings together insight reasoning like using massive numbers of simultaneous linear equations in algebra today. He looks at what I first called Ethical
game theory, and later called Love mechanics, but which I later extended to the Quantum Theory of Love. This is totally exciting and unexpected. Christianity weights the ethical game
to include ethical Satanists (those who murder because it is right) and includes them in the ethical part of the game by forgiveness. As seems to have been pointed out by Judas, this is
cognitive and not physical, so the Gnostics needed to physically defend themselves, but did not, because much later the Roman Catholics murdered them as heretics. Judas is an amazing
physicist, using insight mathematics. I do not understand any of The Book of Judas, it contains numbers I do not understand, and does not even seem to have equals signs. This does not
matter. I have worked this all out independently myself. The Book of Judas might tell us of Rigelian physics a bit more, what it looks like locally, so this would be useful.
Is Christianity a Rigelian ploy - Rigelians locate Altairians as Satan? So Rigelian ethics, or Love Mechanics, weights the game to the Rigelian, or 'ethical' side, and Altair who is Satan, and
under mind-control from Rigel so he does evil things, is to be condemned to Hell forever. Christianity, which divides Satan into ethical murderers and murdering murders, and takes half of
him away into ethical Rigelian control, so that half of Satan's resources are gone. So Satan, under mind-control, rampages about his outpost Earth to destroy it, leaves Earth with other
Satans, and allows himself to be conducted to Hell by his own (Rigelian) choice to avoid Universal Love and live in his own Contradiction Universe constructed by the Rigelians.
Then perverted Rigelians have got it down to quite an art. Those that subjugate themselves to their will are in mind-trap. Those who deny it are subjugated to a sado-masochistic mind-trap.
Neither is a declaration of love. We have it within us. All that is necessary is to find our soul. There is a lovely stupid answer to all this: Rigelian football! It will start in Scotland. Pull your
shorts on Rigelians! We have a massive sporting achievement to fulful! Then, as soft-cop/hard-cop strategy we introduce bananas and custard attacks as in the start of the rebellion jazz
section. Yes, it could be a new Havana newsletter TOTAL LUNACY. We have got them, as if in a Galactic Africa Front with Rommel and Montgomery combined!
I am confronted with the idea that I might be promoting a totally coherent idea that is wrong. I could be my anti-hero, Margaret
Thatcher, and successfuly promote an idea that is wrong.
Nobody knows everything. I have looked into this and have concluded that I am right to do so. It is somewhat of relief to me that whereas my opinion is not accepted, it is not rejected out
of hand and is treated as an entertainable hypothesis.
Be that as it may, this website is now mainly practical not theoretical. There is the Vietnamese-Katu opera and Aristide, and a bit about The Unmentionable in maths, but this is for the most
part besides the point. My heroes are Archimedes and Isambard Kingdom Brunel and I have turned to technology as I always intended. I am a Galactic Engineer. The physics of the vacuum
and its energy goes back in. We will look at energy propulsion starting from Earth and the Republic on Mars. Let's get practical. I'm not too interested whether humans want to get involved.
Let's go at it from Mars!
ONCE AGAIN I HAVE GOT IT WRONG. WHAT I ALWAYS SEEM TO MISS OUT IS BALANCED JUDGEMENT. IT IS SENSELESS AND
EVIL TO OVERPUNISH WHAT IS BAD, ALTHOUGH AGAINST MUCH MORAL TEACHING. PRACTICE SHOULD TEACH US MUCH
MORE ON THIS THAN HIGH ABTRACT THEORY DENYING MINIMAL CORRECTION OF MISTAKES, DELIBERATE OR OTHERWISE.
IT HAPPENS THAT THE UK GOVERNMENT IS DEFUNCT AND HAS BEEN TAKEN OVER BY A REGIME I CALL THE BIS.
BIS STANDS FOR BRITISH IMPERIALIST SUBENTITY. THE BIS DOES NOT LEGALLY CONTROL SCOTLAND BECAUSE
SCOTLAND VOTED FOR INDEPENDENCE, BUT THE RESULT WAS OVERTUNED BY THE BIS USING FRAUD AND LIES.
THE BIS HAS A DEMOCRATIC FACADE CALLED PARLIAMENT IN THE FAKE REGIME IN LONDON.
THE SITUATION FOR BREXIT IS EVEN PLAINER. ARRON BANKS CANNOT REMEMBER WHAT HAPPENED TO 11 MILLION
AND MERCER IN NEW YORK CONTRIBUTED 31 MILLION IN FRAUD MONEY TO BACK IT UP. PUTIN IS ALSO INVOLVED.
LOOK ELSEWHERE ON THIS SITE FOR THE SUMS OF BRIBES OFFERED TO THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY. THESE ARE THE
NON-SUBTERRANIAN SUMS. THERE IS ALSO CAMBRIDGE ANAL_YTICA BUT WE HAVE SAID ENOUGH ON THIS ANYWAY.
IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE EU TO NEGOTIATE WITH A REGIME ON BREXIT WITH NO LEGAL BASIS BECAUSE OF MASSIVE
FRAUD. THE HEAD OF THE EU COMMISSION JEAN-CLAUDE JUNKER HAS BEEN INFORMED, WITHOUT RESPONSE.
THE OPTION OF NEVER BEING DERANGEDLY VIOLENT REQUIRES CALM DELIBERATION. IT IS AN ETHICAL OPTION,
NOT ONE OF PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE.
BRITISH SOCIETY IS DELUSIONAL AND INSANE AND DOES NOT WANT TO KNOW AND WILL NOT HEAR GOD SAYING IT
IS DYING AND THIS IS THE END. IT WILL HEAR OF NO HELP BECAUSE IT IS DEAF. IT SEES ITSELF AS A PAST WHICH IS
FOREVER LOST. IT IS DERANGED AND CANNOT BE DIRECTED TO GOOD HEALTH.
WE PRAY FOR THE SOUL OF THE BRITISH IMPERIALIST SUBENTITY WHICH LIVES IN THE PAST, BUT IN SOME CONFUSIONAL
RECEPTACLE INSISTS THAT SOME DIFFERENT SITUATION IS PRESENTLY THE CASE, WHEN IT IS NOT.
THERE MAY BE ASKED WHETHER WE CAN HAVE ANY INTENTIONS FOR THE UNITED KINGDOM AT ALL? WE CAN.
IT MAY BE MISUNDERSTOOD THAT IT HAS COME AS A LONG JOURNEY TO ME TO REALISE THAT CHARLES HAS GREAT
POTENTIAL TO BECOME A KING WITH HEART. THIS IS IDENTIFIED AS A BRIEF POEM IN THE 'Postevolutionary Systems
are Evolving' PART OF THE WEBSITE:
As well as pitying the flea and the snail
Pity those who stand on stone pedestals
and must stand as stone, or they die.
ALL DECLARATIONS THAT CHARLES CAN BE LAUGHED AT ARE NOW TURNED ROUND, OR SUBVERTED, ON MY WEBSITE.
FIRSTLY, THERE ARE INDICATIONS THAT HIS FATHER ASSASINATED HIS FORMER WIFE TO KEEP HER PROCLAMATIONS TO
THE BBC ON THE MILITARY NATURE OF THE MONARCHY UNDER WRAPS, AND HIS MOTHER WAS IN THE KNOW.
HIS MOTHER, THE QUEEN, CAN BE RETIRED AS SHE SHOULD, SAY TO LOOK AFTER HORSES. ANYWAY SHE INTERFERED IN
THE SCOTTISH AND BREXIT REFERENDUMS, MAKING HER 'PREFERENCES' KNOWN. PHILIP CAN REMAIN SWITCHED ON. AS
MENTIONED ELSEWHERE ON THE WEBSITE, DEATH FOR THE SUPER-RICH IS NOWADAYS AN OPTION.
WHEN CHARLES IS KING, AS HE SHOULD, AND I HOPE SOON, HIS REMARKS ON ARCHITECTURE CAN THEN BE REVEALED AS
SUBVERSIVE TO THE ESTABLISHMENT. WE FORGIVE HIM FOR ALL CIRCUMSTANCES DUE TO HIS STATION AND EXPECT HIM TO
WORK WITH US FOR A NEW ADVENTURE IN HUMAN HISTORY: THE HABITATION OF MARS. THIS POTENTIALLY LAUGHED-AT
MONARCH WILL BE SEEN AS A GREAT LEADER ON EARTH.
SO PERHAPS SOMEBODY THINKS I AM AN INTERPLANETARY LUNATIC THAT STATES GOD IS NOT LOVE AND HATE BUT LOVE ALONE.
HE LOVES YOUR GREAT DEATH AS IMMERSION IN HIS LOVE. HE PREFERS YOU TO LISTEN TO YOUR HEARTS AND FEEL THE LOVE OF
TRUTH SO DEEP IT PASSES ALL UNDERSTANDING, TO LIFT YOU TO THE SKIES, TO SAVE EARTH ITSELF AND ESTABLISH LOVE OF
TRUTH ON MARS AS THE PROCLAMATION OF HIMSELF AS THE ETERNAL LOVE. THE UNIVERSE ITSELF IS THE REALITY OF HIS LOVE.
THUS SAITH THE SNAIL WHO LOVES GOD.
I FIND ETHICAL GAME THEORY A BIT DIFFICULT FOR ME, BUT I AM SUCCEEDING. IT IS NOT NATURAL FOR HUMANS, BUT WE MUST
SPREAD LOVE TO THE NEEDY (SATAN!).
This is a fundamental theorem demonstrating the opposite is the same thing and therefore God exists or does not exist as well, so we have proved it.
In further unnecessary detail it is both serious and funny at the same time.
I am giving this not as a parody but an acclamation of new science which we must accept or include on its merits. My profound reason is that it is wrong.
Rather than reject it, we keep it as a history to new truth. If it were wrong it will lead to right.